Nothing counts seats.
No seat concept exists anywhere in the product. Usage is metered in tokens per person against the provider's own record of the call.
org.tech is the company. orgOS is the product, and the deployment is yours.
orgOS is not a service you log into. It lands in your cloud account and stays there. The dashboard carries your name, the data at rest sits in your storage, and the controls are written as infrastructure rather than promised in a document.
A deployment is not a zip file handed over, and not a tenant on our servers. It is a tagged release of one codebase, layered with your parameters, built into your own account by our deployment factory. What arrives is a working environment with six parts, all under your account's identity and billing.
White-labelled at build time. Hosted sign-in, tokens in httpOnly cookies, a user directory in your account. Passkeys and second factors are self-service.
Streaming chat with model and region selectors, sessions, attachments and voice dictation, plus an optional knowledge base that cites its source document.
Attached to every inference call and enforced by cloud identity policy as a deny, never an application setting. Pinned to a numbered version. Tests fail the build if a deny is weakened.
Users, roles with grants editable at runtime, an access matrix, per-person token quotas that fail closed, usage by person. Reading a transcript is itself audited.
Modules framed inside the dashboard, each on its own origin, reaching resources only through short-lived credentials tagged to the person using them.
A generated catalogue of 104 models from 18 labs, each classified by where a request is actually processed. A pinned deployment refuses in words rather than rerouting.
Multi-tenant products isolate you with code. orgOS isolates you with an account boundary that holds whether our code is correct or not.
No seat concept exists anywhere in the product. Usage is metered in tokens per person against the provider's own record of the call.
Platform infrastructure has run roughly $5 to $10 a month at Baseline, about $110 on the private-network tiers, excluding inference.
The monthly fee buys the service, not access. Running it afterwards needs a competent cloud engineer, which is why runbooks are deliverables.
Composable means models. Switching between frontier models is a parameter change on the same governed route. Switching cloud provider would be a rebuild.
Most private AI means they hold your data privately. Ours means you do.The line the platform is built to earn
Everything in the grid above arrives configured: sign-in, chat, the knowledge base if you want it, quotas, administration and the audit record. Your policy is written into the deployment rather than circulated, and a page inside the product shows the resolved controls and the exceptions we have not yet closed. This is the phase that ends the shadow usage.
Then it becomes where your own operating capability gets built: modules carrying your way of doing things, with governed access to your records and, where it earns its place, inference. Each is scoped and priced as a deliverable. Most never call a model at all, because what organizations use day to day is governed business software.
Every deployment comes from a tagged release and a clean checkout. A capability built for phase two arrives the same way the platform did: a tag that exists in a repository, stamped into the running system so it can tell you itself what version it is. The factory.
| Decision or duty | org.tech | You |
|---|---|---|
| The cloud account and its root credentials | ✕Never ours | ✓Yours, in your name |
| The compute invoice | ✕We never hold it | ✓Billed to you directly |
| Releases, deploys, drift and diff checks | ✓We run them | ✕Nothing to do |
| Users, groups, roles and grants | △On request | ✓Your administrators |
| Content policy, allowlist, tier, residency | ✓Changed by release | △You decide, we apply |
| Promoting a module to production | ✕Our automation cannot | ✓A named administrator |
| Evidence for your security review | ✓We produce it | ✓You own the programme |
"Changed by release" is the point: a deploy-time parameter cannot be altered by anyone signed into the running system, us included. See what administrators cannot do, or the full responsibility split.
Releases rolled one deployment at a time and confirmed, drift and diff checks, acceptance scripts that exercise your real deployment over HTTPS after a deploy, catalogue refreshes, cost watch with budget alarms, a dated operations journal, and a direct line to the person who built it, with no queue. $500 a month, cancel anytime.
No. There is no shared service to sign into and no tenant of ours holding your data. What you subscribe to is managed operations, and cancelling it does not take the platform away.
You do, directly to your cloud provider at list price. Light team usage has run an estimated $40 to $120 a month all in: what we have seen, not a quote. Compute costs breaks it down.
You keep the platform, its source and its infrastructure-as-code. Runbooks and infrastructure-as-code are deliverables from the start, for exactly that reason. Ownership and exit sets out what running it yourself takes.
Yes. The demo is our own deployment of the same product, not a mock. The assessment is $2,500 and you keep the deliverable whether or not you proceed.
104 active models from 18 labs at the last catalogue generation, produced from the provider's live list rather than typed by us. Where a request is processed matters more than the count: see model access.
Chat is the first capability, not the product. Day-to-day work happens in modules, and most never call a model. Inference is not always the answer.
If your AI vendor disappeared tomorrow, would anything still run? With us, you log into your own cloud and keep running.
A bounded $2,500 engagement ending in a written deployment plan for your own account, yours to keep whether or not you proceed.